The EU should join the Swiss Confederation

Switzerland should not join the EU, but the EU should join the Swiss Confederation of twenty-six democratic republics.

The country should seriously and critically consider whether it will sign the so-called Rahmenabkommen, accord-cadre or Institutional Treaty. 

Sovereignty

The sovereignty that is transferred to the EU is lost forever. And the EU is never satisfied. In ten years’ time membership or an end of the Rahmenabkommen will be on the table.

Reform

The EU and most of its members can and will not reform and this EU lacks self-reflection (the issue of the Brexit referendum in 2016).

The EU is based on an old-fashioned subsidy system (75% budget, 40% to the agricultural sector (2% of the GNP), an overpaid, privileged and overstaffed Eurocracy, protectionism and above all ambitions and megalomaniac projects.

This EU does not necessarily unite the good qualities of the members but unites the bad characteristics.

Around 52% of the British citizens intuitively expressed this fact in 2016. 62% of Dutch voters were ignored in the Netherlands in the referendums of 2005 and 2016. The Dutch government abolished the referendum for this reason.

The Basler Fasnacht and the European Union

The Basler Fasnacht has undergone many changes over the centuries. Participants expose themselves without masks to the public on three Sundays after the Fasnacht.

The EU never takes off its masks and is not a (direct) democracy or system based on the trias politica. If the EU does not keep up with the times but sticks to its dogmas.

This EU is unifying the incompatible from above. This process will not have a happy end.

William Tell and the Congress of Vienna

1291-1513

When the Habsburg rulers of the areas in central Switzerland failed to maintain peace and protect the roads, three rural communities acted and concluded a peace alliance in 1291.

These alliances were rather common in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, and they reflected the interest of local elites, whether rural, urban, or nobility.

The alliance covered a (rural or urban) territory or a network of cities and communes. The allies agreed to help each other against aggressors, to maintain the peace and to settle (trade, business, territorial) disputes.

The short-lived Swabian-, Rhenish- or Lombard leagues are a few other examples. The successful Hanseatic League of trading cities existed for more than four centuries., but disappeared in the end.

The alliance of Uri, Schwyz and Unterwalden gradually led to the Swiss Eidgenossenschaft and finally to the sovereign nation-state, which lasted for centuries.

The oath was a common symbol to ratify treaties and alliances, and “Eidgenossenschaft” means a confederation by oath. No one wanted to separate from the (divine) Habsburg lords or the Habsburgs, but it is a fact that these communities established an Alliance.

Rudolf I of Habsburg (1217-1291) became German king in 1273 but was lord of the valleys Uri, Schwytz, and Unterwalden and other territories and cities of present-day Switzerland.

The extinction of the former lords (the dukes of Zähringen), led to the Habsburg jurisdiction over these valleys, which controlled the St. Gotthard Pass, opened in 1230.

Rudolf developed new structures by establishing jurisdictions called “Landvogteien” (bailiwicks) to oversee the towns and rural communities. The bailiff (Vogt) was selected from the loyal aristocracy and knights who were charged with safeguarding royal (tax) prerogatives and upholding peace within their jurisdictions.

The famous story of William Tell (Wilhelm Tell), who refused to greet the bailiff’s hat and became the national hero, occurred in this period. It is not relevant whether this event happened: it is a lovely story and describes the context.

Alliances

Two alternatives for organizing local political life emerged across Europe around 1350 and in Switzerland. The bottom-down approach was the administration by lords who used new bureaucratic methods to build up effective peace-keeping, judicial and tax systems.

The Swiss grassroots approach was a network of semi-autonomous rural, ecclesiastical and urban communities linked by alliances, while each ally managed its own internal affairs.

The Confederation, or Eidgenossenschaft was considered a distinct nation after the Swabian war (Schwaben- or Schweizerkrieg) in 1499, regardless of its internal struggles, divisions and lack of central institutions or confederal Constitution.

The thirteen cantons were still part of the Holy Roman Empire in 1513, although with complete exemption from imperial law and judiciary (with the Reichskammergericht in Speyer/Wetzlar and the Reichshofrat in Vienna as supreme imperial courts).

1648

The Peace of Westphalia in 1648 (24 October) was silent about the sovereignty issue, not explicitly mentioning it. The (Latin) text (Art VI just mentioned the “Völlige Freiheit und Exemption “, i.e. full freedom and exemption (from taxes and jurisdiction).

Many cities kept using imperial symbolism until late into the eighteenth century. Coats of arms (the double-headed eagle) were not removed from buildings.

Six cities — Basel, Zurich, Bern, Schaffhausen, Solothurn and Luzern — formally announced their sovereign status ( “ein freyer souveräner Stand zu sein”)  in the seventeenth century.

A contemporary theoretical approach to sovereignty and the acts of a sovereign entity were only relevant from the perspective of the protocol. The Swiss, contrary to the formally sovereign Dutch Republic of the (Seven) United Provinces (1648), did not have a Prince-Stadholder, a united standing army or a States-General with real powers.

The Confederation was de facto sovereign and formally exempted from imperial jurisdiction and taxes, but it would take another 150 years (after the Napoleonic wars and the Congress of Vienna) for its sovereignty (and neutrality) to be recognized.

A continuing and difficult development of nation-building, begun at the time of William Tell as an open-end story,  reached its zenith with the Constitution drawn up in 1848

(Source: P.H. Wilson, Heart of Europe. A History of the Holy Roman Empire, Cambridge (MA), 2016; C.H. Church, R.C. Head, A Concise History of Switzerland, Cambridge 2017; B. Marquardt, Die alte Eidgenossenschaft und das Heilige Römische Reich (1350-1798), Zürich 2007).

The Alpine Convention

The formation of political unities in Europe can be described as a process of concentration.

At the beginning of early modern times, around 1500, there were about two hundred independent states on the continent, shortly before 1900, there were only thirty. The increasing size of state territories is reflected in their declining numbers.

In the Alpine region one can see this process as well:  Johann Heinrich Zedler (1706-1751) enumerated more than twenty political units in the Alps in 1732.

The encyclopedias of the late 19th century no longer mentioned these political entities, except for the states, the German Reich. the Austrian Monarchy, the Kingdom of Italy, the French Republic and the Swiss Confederation.

The borders between the nation-states became barriers. After the Second World War, the development went into a different direction.

Regionalism is evident in the Alpine region. The Alpine Convention of 7 November 1991 is a clear signal. This region created a political structure. (J. Mathieu, Die Alpen. Raum, Kultur, Geschichte, Stuttgart 2015).